17 best rear view cameras

Car rear view cameras are a complete alternative to parking sensors with the ability to assess the situation on the roads behind the car. They are miniature broadcasting devices connected to an onboard multimedia system or screens and tablets built on top of the bundle. It is subdivided into several separate classes:

1. mortise chambers - installed according to the type of parking sensors, crashing into the hole on the bumper or (which is much less common) in the metal of the body. Technically, the most difficult to install, since for the normal functioning of such a camera it is necessary to think in advance about the installation site and take into account the viewing angle.
2. overhead camera - placed on special stands that are attached (by means of a screw pair or screw) to any surface. In case of need to review the situation behind the most familiar location of such models - near the license plate ceiling. Here, some variation of the viewing angle setting appears, as a result of which the cameras are assigned to the category of universal ones.
3. cameras on license plate frame - systems, installation of which can be considered the simplest of all the proposed options. They represent a metal or plastic frame with built-in cameras, which replaces the standard one-dimensional frame. However, their choice should take into account a couple of important nuances, such as the main dimensions and configuration of the mounting holes.
4. cameras in the trunk handle - are the standard equipment systems of a number of new car models. They represent a ready-made trunk handle with built-in camera, which is mounted instead of the standard one.
5. cameras in the ceiling of the license plate - represent a hybrid system in which, in addition to the camera, the source of the lighting is installed. Due to the fact that standard ceiling lamps are carried out individually for each model of car, similar rear-view cameras are made standard.

Due to the huge number of manufacturing companies and the vastness of the camera range, device selection has become a real problem for consumers. expert.bigbadmole.com/en/, in conjunction with independent experts in this segment, conducted its own market research, which resulted in a ranking of the best rear-view cameras in four thematic categories. The key selection criteria were consumer reviews, as well as their own technical characteristics of selected products.

Rating the best rear view camera

Nomination	a place	Name of product	price
The best overhead rear view camera	1	Alpine HCE-C257FD	17 870 ₽
	2	GARMIN BC 30	23 790 ₽
	3	Avis 985 CMOS	2 490 ₽
	4	Blackview IC-01 Wide	1 681 ₽
	5	Sho-Me CA-9030D	745 ₽
Best Mortise Rear View Cameras	1	AVIS AVS311CPR (185 CCD)	2 900 ₽
	2	Incar VDC-002	3 490 ₽
	3	Swat VDC-002	1 740 ₽
	4	AutoExpert VC-206	1 720 ₽
	5	Digma DCV-210	1 090 ₽
Top cameras mounted on a license plate frame	1	Incar VDC-006S	4 490 ₽
	2	Blackview UC-77	1 900 ₽
	3	Rolsen RRV-200	1 400 ₽
	4	Swat VDC-006	3 230
	5	SHO-ME CA-6184LED	1 280 ₽
Best rear view camera with installation in the trunk handle	1	AVIS AVS326CPR-003	4 900 ₽
	2	Incar VDC-065	4 200 ₽

The best overhead rear view camera

Alpine HCE-C257FD

Rating: 4.9

Another representative of the new formation cameras, using a wireless connection, is much better than the main competitor in the consolidated rating.Alpine HCE-C257FD is a vivid example of the achievements of Japanese engineers who equipped the device with the ability to capture video at HD-resolution (1280x720 pixels). Moreover, they did it in such a way so as not to “bully” the price of the finished product. As a result, the rear view camera turned out to be very balanced in performance, found a number of desirable settings, as well as a pleasant appearance, which is important.

The main functions of the Alpine HCE-C257FD has become the ability to automatically adjust the white balance and exposure by changing the exposure time and aperture value. The only nuance here is that in order to obtain a distinguishable picture, illumination in the region of 1.5 lux is required, while even the weakest, low-end camera models (from other segments) can operate at 0.1-0.2 lux. The viewing angle of the camera is 180 °, in connection with which the driver has the opportunity to more fully observe the situation behind the car, without blind zones. In general, this device manifests itself very well, and the only condition for its long-term use is not to drown in water under any circumstances, because the moisture protection here is made just for a tick.

GARMIN BC 30

Rating: 4.8

A premium system for reviewing the situation behind the car, which includes a remote wi-fi module and the camera itself for image capture. It is very expensive, but it symbolizes a new stage of development of tracking systems that have been transferred from a wired connection to more advanced (though not always more reliable) wirless interfaces. GARMIN BC 30 has a resolution of 640x220 pixels, displaying a picture in a clearly landscape orientation. The frame rate is reduced to 15 per second to allow unhindered connection with the receiver, which imposes certain difficulties for the video drivers at first. Accordingly, there is no question of any projection of marks when parking here, since the system is not able to give a reliable estimate of the distance to the obstacle.

What is really good in this model is four ports for receiving signals and, accordingly, the ability to install four cameras at once for tracking on all sides of the car. The range of the module and the wireless connection is 13.7 meters, and therefore situations with poor connection should not arise. In the end, the rear-view camera GARMIN BC 30 became a victim of circumstances, since it looks quite damp for its current price. If you cut the cost in half, you get the perfect device, but so far - only an annoying second place ranking.

Avis 985 CMOS

Rating: 4.8

Inexpensive rear-view camera, which can be mounted both on the ceiling / number frame and on the bracket, and by means of a standard overlay. It got into the rating due to the efforts of manufacturers to create a reliable model with an abundance of protective functions. Such as enclosure sealing in accordance with the requirements of the IP67 standard, protection against fogging, as well as clogging of the “filling” and housing slots with dust. In addition, despite the use of CMOS-matrix, the resulting image does not distort the graininess: the infrared emitter is responsible for the lighting of the frame, allowing drivers to easily focus on these cameras in the dark.

One of the basic, but nonetheless important functions of the Avis 985 CMOS is the presence of a projection of parking lines.They are not made for a tick, but really help the user to determine the distance to the visible obstacle, thereby preventing possible damage to the vehicle. The resolution of the TV image is 550 lines, and this is the best indicator of broadcasting among all previous nominees rating. In general, the 985th model could easily claim a place higher, but two important facts let it down. First, the connection to the display is established through a wired connection. Secondly, the operating temperature range does not provide the possibility of using the camera in all regions of Russia (from -20 to +50 degrees Celsius). However, the experts have great confidence that the manufacturer will correct these annoying nuances over time.

Blackview IC-01 Wide

Rating: 4.7

Quite an organic candidate for a high place in the ranking of the best, providing an overview of almost the developed angle (178 ° diagonally). It differs from the Sho-Me CA-9030D in the transmission of a higher quality picture (765x504 pixels), including on TV lines (520 lines). Instead of the CMOS-matrix, the Blackview IC-01 Wide uses a more modern 1/3-inch CCD, which makes it possible to shoot more clearly even in poor light conditions - up to 0.1 lux.

Additional “chips” of this rear view camera are the compliance with the highest standard of moisture protection IP68, according to which it can be frankly drowned in water, as well as the presence of projected parking lines, made according to all canons of parktronic sensors. Completing the splendor of the model is that it costs mere pennies - it is unlikely that you will be able to find something more worthwhile for the same 690-900 rubles.

Sho-Me CA-9030D

Rating: 4.6

The budget version of the overhead camera, the main characteristic of which is a very low price. It has viewing angles of 170 and 105 ° horizontally and vertically, respectively, practically not yielding to its direct competitors. It does not display parking lines, however, they transmit the image without distortion (in mirror form), thereby allowing to calculate the stopping time fairly accurately and control the distance. Do not allow to adjust the lens, because of which it is necessary to make adjustments right at the time of installation.

The resolution of the broadcast image is 656x492 pixels, but the quality is highly dependent on the time of shooting. The CMOS matrix in the Sho-Me CA-9030D generates noise in low light conditions, which makes it practically impossible to use the camera in the dark. But in the manufacture of manufacturers took into account the likelihood of dipping the device into the water, and, accordingly, took care of sealing the case (in full compliance with IP67). But here the temperature indicators slightly pumped up, according to which it is simply impossible to use the model in the harsh winter periods of Siberia, for -20 degrees Celsius is the standard mode here. The rest is a decent option for those who do not want to spend too much and do not expect transcendental functionality from the camera.

Best Mortise Rear View Cameras

AVIS AVS311CPR (185 CCD)

Rating: 4.9

The camera eye with an even better mechanism for fixing the camera in the landing slot, using a fundamentally higher-quality version of the matrix to capture the image. Manufacturers went to a conscious rejection of the CMOS-matrix, opting for the CCD. There are a lot of positive trends from such a decision: from almost complete elimination of noise (which is especially noticeable when shooting at night) to the uniform photosensitivity of each individual pixel. Accordingly, even with a resolution of 512x492, a significant increase in quality is observed, which, within the framework of the rating, simply cannot be ignored.

The minimum required illumination of AVIS AVS311CPR (185 CCD) for obtaining a distinguishable image remained at the level of 0.1 lux - it is strange that, having decided to upgrade by replacing the matrix, the manufacturers did not think to equip the camera with backlight. However, this does not affect the high level of its work. From the rest stand out moisture protection IP68, a projection of tags to facilitate orientation during parking, as well as a set of mounts, going (standardly) complete with the camera itself.

Incar VDC-002

Rating: 4.8

From a purely visual point of view, the Incar VDC-002 is a complete analogue of the previous nominee, with the only difference that the locking "horns" here are made in a much more reliable manner. Inside the camera there is the same 1/3 inch CMOS matrix, the same color formats (PAL, NTSC), the same resolution TVL (480 lines), but a more “square” image captured by the camera (resolution 628x582 pixels).

There are no striking differences between Incar and Swat even in the functional plane. Here, as in the competitor, there is a projection of marks for parking, moisture protection class IP67, as well as a mirror image of the picture. And only the required illumination (0.1 lux) sets the tone for the few subtleties that take place. Against the background of such small changes, the increase in the cost, even if it is a penny, does not look the best way ... until it comes to the rigidity of the installation and the accompanying moments. The above-mentioned petals, fixing the camera in the nest, are made of an elastic metal alloy, which prevents plastic deformation and, accordingly, a weakening of the fit. In this connection, the separation and displacement of the camera become almost impossible, in contrast to cases with Swat VDC-002.

Swat VDC-002

Rating: 4.8

Another mortise tracking eye of the budget segment without the ability to customize the slope and location of the review, but with a number of other useful features. Swat VDC-002 seems to be a somewhat weaker analogue of the AutoExpert VC-206, the only superior function of which is to allow broadcasting on a TV line (480 pixels). In normal mode, the video is written with a resolution of 648x488 pixels by capturing a CMOS matrix 1/3 inch. Fortunately, the supported color modes allow the camera to work with PAL and NTSC tape recorders without problems, providing at least some semblance of variability and universality.

As for additional features, here Swat VDC-002 can offer optimal moisture and dust protection for the execution of IP67, the projection of parking tags, as well as the display of images in the mirror. Of the rest, only 0.2 lux of the required illumination for image acquisition, as well as a complete connection set consisting of two coaxial channels, stand out.

AutoExpert VC-206

Rating: 4.7

Universal rear view camera with the ability to attach to the bracket, tripod or in the slot, giving the driver the ability to adjust the slope and, accordingly, the viewpoint with an angle of 170 °. Despite the low price, it has the ability to project virtual parking lines onto the display in order to facilitate the parking process. The resolution of the picture supplied to the radio is 648x488 pixels, and there is a real possibility of shooting at night, because the camera matrix requires only 0.1 lux of illumination to form a clearly visible image.

As a beneficial difference from most of the nominees presented here, AutoExpert VC-206 has the highest level of protection against moisture: IP68. Due to this, the camera is not afraid of full immersion to a depth of more than 1 meter, as well as sudden pressure drops due to the formation of turbulent and laminar flows in the water section being passed. In many respects, it is precisely because of this and not the most aesthetic appearance of the camera that the owners of large crossovers and SUVs, who are not averse to driving out of the city on the roads, have chosen the camera very much.

Digma DCV-210

Rating: 4.6

Mortise "peephole" from the company Digma - the most budget and attractive solution to the problem of reviewing the situation behind the car, giving an image of adequate quality even in the dark. This DCV-210 is largely due to infrared illumination, which turns on when the camera is switched to night mode. The resolution of the original image is 640x480 pixels, which is a satisfactory result even by the standards of expensive models.

Of the additional features of the Digma DCV-210, you can highlight the presence of moisture protection in case the installation will be made in the material of the rear bumper to match the sensors of parking sensors. However, even in spite of the IP67 mark, it is not recommended to flood them and make them deliberately work underwater: the depressurization of individual hull elements may overtake the device unexpectedly. The rest of the rear view camera shows itself perfectly, which is naturally expressed in high popularity among car owners.

Top cameras mounted on a license plate frame

Incar VDC-006S

Rating: 4.9

It so happens that the Incar VDC-006S is the most expensive, and at the same time the most powerful frame camera in the segment, which proved itself to be on expert testing from the best side. First, I would like to note the intangible, but the reliability indicator present here, both in terms of the camera’s “insides” and the strength of the frame itself. Secondly, it is worth noting the highest resolution (628x582 pixels) and a more “square” picture on the camera output, based on the use of a 1/3 inch CMOS matrix.

The next and final moment of striking difference Incar VDC-006S from competitors exists in the plane of the minimum required illumination for the possibility of image transmission. Here it is 0.1 lux, and allows you to more effectively use the camera in the dark. Alone should be noted the presence of parking tags, as well as moisture protection at the level of IP67, due to which the sensitive "stuffing" is not afraid of flooding and the pressure of a meter layer of water.

Blackview UC-77

Rating: 4.8

If with the model of the frame camera from Rolsen there is a hint of budgetaryness even in terms of functionality, then with Blackview UC-77 everything is not so simple. A slightly more expensive device is an example of how quality becomes the main derivative of popularity among users of all financial levels. Based on the CMOS matrix, this rear view camera has a resolution of 648x488 pixels, or, when outputting via TV lines, 420 lines. Supports color format PAL and NTSC, so it can interface with the vast majority of modern multimedia technology in the car.

But, perhaps, the main feature of the Blackview UC-77 is the presence of parking marks. If the previous representatives of the segment provided only a visual determination of the distance to the intended obstacle, then here the driver is entitled to rely on standard marks indicating quite specific distance to objects. All this is associated with the ability to work in direct and mirror mode of displaying images, as well as with a viewing angle of 170 °. For its price, the device is more than worthy.

Rolsen RRV-200

Rating: 4.7

The main advantage of the candidate for leadership from Rolsen is an extremely low price that perfectly correlates with the few "chips" embedded in the camera structure. Rolsen RRV-200 uses a budget, but very smart in terms of image processing, a CMOS matrix measuring размером inch. In this scenario, the resolution of the standard 640x480 pixels looks like a very worthy result.

As for the reliability of the picture displayed on the display of the radio, it turns out to be mirrored, which is typical of all devices in the budget link. On this basis, the RRV-200 is no different from previous nominees, as well as not inferior to them in terms of moisture resistance. IP67 is the coveted minimum that all interested in the fight products of this category pledged to comply with. Largely due to the low price and the actual “indestructibility” in the water, the Rolsen frame camera has become the object of great demand from off-road drivers who like to make frequent trips outside the city limits.

Swat VDC-006

Rating: 4.6

A frame of a higher level of performance, having the appropriate indicators of protection against the ingress of moisture and dust, as well as automatic adjustment of white balance for the transmission of equally high-quality images at any time of the day. It has a resolution of 648x488 pixels, and by this indicator almost completely outperforms a SHO-ME frame camera. However, it costs almost three times more than that, while giving a lot of other positive properties.

In particular, it is worth highlighting a more stable signal at the level of 48 dB, as well as 0.2 lux of illumination, the minimum required to ensure the capture and presentation of a discernable image to the display. Made in compliance with the conditions of class IP67, Swat VDC-006 ensures stable operation under water at a depth of up to 1.5 meters. It is also noteworthy that the range of permissible temperatures varies between -30 and +70 degrees Celsius, making the camera suitable for use in most parts of Russia.

SHO-ME CA-6184LED

Rating: 4.5

According to consumers, the SHO-ME CA-6184LED is an exemplary frame-type camera, with absolutely no flaws in terms of functionality for its modest cost. Equipped with a 1/3 inch CMOS sensor, which provides fast image processing and gives the minimum amount of noise even when shooting at dusk. The resolution of the resulting image is 512x492 pixels, which also contributes to an adequate perception of the situation behind the car when parking or maneuvering in a limited space.

A notable feature of the SHO-ME CA-6184LED is its performance class. Dust-proof and waterproof of the device complies with the IP67 standard, according to the interpretation of which it can be immersed to a depth of over 1 meter without fear of efficiency and integrity. Thus, this model will be an excellent option for a complete set of off-road vehicles, which are often chosen for off-road and walk through mud areas, as well as waded through shallow reservoirs. The price of the issue, as mentioned above, is minimal, but the quality is at the level of more demanding cameras.

Best rear view camera with installation in the trunk handle

AVIS AVS326CPR-003

Rating: 4.9

The AVIS AVS326CPR-003 rear-view camera, which fits a single car model (but which one) of the 2010 Porsche Cayenne II, could not pass by the rating. In many ways, she deserved the most complementary feedback from experts, since she absorbed not only the satisfactory dynamic shooting parameters, but also a number of systems that facilitate the parking process and improve the received picture.

First, it is worth highlighting the presence of dynamic (and static) parking markings with a very accurate calibration of the distance to the intended obstacle. There is an automatic gain control AGC, the compensator of the reflected light and automatic white balancing. The viewing angle, as in the case of the Incar VDC-065, is 170 °, allowing the driver to get a complete overview of the traffic situation at the rear. As practice shows, users rarely resort to purchasing this camera, preferring more versatile models. The reason here lies in the need for additional costs for replacing the handle and laying the contact wire, which is not necessary in a machine of this class at all.

Incar VDC-065

Rating: 4.8

Rearview parking camera for Audi and Volkswagen cars, ranked due to excellent visibility indicators. It transmits an image of 628x582 pixels to the car stereo, the quality of which is enough to assess the situation behind the car. The maximum illumination at which the camera is capable of transmitting a picture is 0.1 lux, and therefore, if there is even a minimal light source (read at night), it will be useful.

The Incar VDC-065 has a viewing angle of 170 °, and the camera is far superior in terms of its category in this indicator. It differs positively and the degree of moisture protection corresponding to the level of performance IP66. The working temperature of the device is also clearly designed for versatility in terms of climatic zones of operation, adequately practicing with indicators from -40 to +65 degrees Celsius.According to users, the cost of the camera relative to the entire component variety for German car brands is very, very modest: for a device of this level you need to put out of pocket a little less than 4 thousand rubles. Together with high quality and reliability, such a price tag gives an appropriate plus to popularity, causing high demand from domestic consumers.

---

Attention! This rating is subjective, is not advertising and does not serve as a guide to the purchase. Before buying, you should consult with a specialist.